Evaluating the feasibility of direct contact membrane distillation and nanofiltration in ground water treatment through a techno-economic analysis

dc.contributor.authorElboughdiri, Noureddine
dc.contributor.authorCosma, Renzun
dc.contributor.authorAmari, Abdelfattah
dc.contributor.authorSpalevic, Velibor
dc.contributor.authorDudic, Branislav
dc.contributor.authorSkataric, Goran
dc.date.accessioned2026-11-05T05:56:15Z
dc.date.issued2024-05-13
dc.description.abstractThis study delves into the realm of water treatment by conducting a comprehensive techno-economic evaluation of direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) and nanofiltration (NF) processes. While previous research has explored the technical aspects of membrane distillation (MD) and nanofiltration, there remains a notable gap in economic analyses. Our research aims to bridge this gap by assessing the financial feasibility of employing MD and NF technologies for water desalination. Specifically, we scrutinize the performance of hydrophobic microporous flat sheet membranes crafted from polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) supported by non-woven polypropylene (PP) in desalinating brackish water through DCMD and NF processes. By varying operating conditions such as flow rate and feed temperature, we evaluate the membrane's efficacy. Employing an analytical model based on heat and mass transfer equations, we predict process performance across diverse scenarios. Our model demonstrates a high level of accuracy, with flux predictions deviating by less than 10% when utilizing the Knudsen-molecular mechanism model. Furthermore, through a detailed design and economic analysis of industrial-scale units for both processes, we reveal that the cost of permeated water is lower with NF compared to DCMD. Specifically, our calculations indicate a water cost of 1.34 USD/m³ for DCMD at a feed temperature of 65 °C with an 80% recovery rate, positioning it as a competitive option among conventional desalination methods. Notably, our financial assessment highlights that steam cost constitutes the primary expense in DCMD operations, contingent upon heating value and fuel prices. Noteworthy findings suggest that natural gas emerges as the most cost-effective fuel for steam production in a DCMD plant. This study underscores the economic viability and potential cost efficiencies associated with NF over DCMD in water treatment applications.
dc.description.sponsorshipKing Khalid University, Deanship of Research and Graduate Studies, Large Groups Project, grant RGP.2/36/45
dc.identifier.citationElboughdiri, N., Cosma, R., Amari, A., Spalevic, V., Dudic, B., & Skataric, G. (2024). Evaluating the feasibility of direct contact membrane distillation and nanofiltration in ground water treatment through a techno-economic analysis. Applied Water Science, 14(6), Article 130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-024-02185-4
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-024-02185-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12833/3020
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:2190-5487
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectDirect contact membrane distillation (DCMD)
dc.subjectEconomic study
dc.subjectHeat and mass transfer
dc.subjectNanofiltration (NF)
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.07.01
dc.titleEvaluating the feasibility of direct contact membrane distillation and nanofiltration in ground water treatment through a techno-economic analysis
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Elboughdiri_2024_Evaluating-the-feasibility.pdf
Tamaño:
2,35 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format